On 8 Oct 2002, Gerald Timothy Quimpo wrote: .. > a long time ago (more than a year, maybe as much as two years ago) you > had only praise for Win2K. Lately, I've been working with a client who > uses Win2K. I'm curious to see if you've changed your mind. Is Win2K > (as a client, and separately, as a server) GOOD ENOUGH?
I was full of praises for Win2k.. AS COMPARED TO WIN98. Basically Win2k gives me (some) Unix/Linux benefits and still lets me play my games. And it's been stable enough for me. I used my dual-boot workstation for a while as a JSP server for our Bancnet implementation *hehehe* and it was ok. Apache-Tomcat running on Win2k was quite amusing.. But to be honest.. compared to RedHat 8.. Win2k can't compare even in the beauty category. :) The only reason I have Win2k around is to play Warcraft III. But WC3 allegedly will run under the CVS Wine. --- Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mosaic Communications, Inc. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
