--- "Horatio B. Bogbindero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I built linux-2.4.20, gcc-3.2.1, and glibc-2.3.1 all the existing > binaries > > that were built against glibc-2.x.y (older than > 2.3.1) still work,
In my box all of the binaries I compiled against the old glibc-2 broked (including gpart arggg), from the errors i got while compiling them again, the fix was to add #include <errno.h> to the header files that needs it. > > Does glibc-2.3.1 break ldconfig? Is there a fix? > > > am not familiar with this but shouldn't you also > build a ldconfig > that comes with or is compatible with your new > glibc? the new ldconfig > should be backward compatible diba? I think william is right, get the ldconfig for the new glibc, running ldconfig -v works fine for me and I'm using the latest ldconfig for the new glibc. Please do post back if you find anymore problems with the new glibc, we might encounter it too thanks. -Dek __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
