Hi Mike, There was no file like .bash_profile in the root directory.
Rolex ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:56 PM Subject: plug digest, Vol 1 #2466 - 16 msgs > Send plug mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of plug digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla) > 2. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla) > 3. Re: nat/routing (Mark M. Barrios) > 4. RE: John C. Dvorak on SCO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 5. Re: automatic logout (RReyes) > 6. RE: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Miguel de Leon) > 7. Re: Re: automatic logout (Mike Liguit) > 8. Re: Firewall before a NAT machine (ian perez) > 9. PS2 cluster (Joel Realubit) > 10. Restrict command in shell (Marc Chan) > 11. Re: Restrict command in shell (Reynald I. Ngo) > 12. Re: Restrict command in shell (Brian Baquiran) > 13. RE: Restrict command in shell (Miranda, Joel Louie M) > 14. RE: Restrict command in shell (Miranda, Joel Louie M) > 15. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rick Moen) > 16. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rick Moen) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:32:57 +0800 > From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:08:01PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > > Dvorak: And what happens if there is an out-of-court settlement and IBM > > does some under-the-table deal and suddenly emerges as the top Linux > > vendor with the only legal license to use certain aspects of the kernel? > > Reality: The moment those "aspects" are identified, all code that might > > be encumbered gets discarded and rewritten from scratch. > > > > Another Reality: Dvorak has never read the GPL. IBM cannot get a legal > license "to use certain aspects of the kernel" without licensing it > free of charge to anyone and everyone. If they attempted to do so, > Torvalds and the rest of the Linux kernel developers could sue them > for copyright violation, as they would then be in violation of the GPL > and be distributing the kernel without a license. > > -- > Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph> +63(2)8123151 > Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc. +63(917)4458925 > "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. > It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:38:28 +0800 > From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:46:36AM +0800, CYWare wrote: > > Disturbing is an understatement! Would you or anyone know if this lawsuit > > affects FreeBSD? > > Disturbing is an overstatement. As usual Dvorak is being alarmist. The > lawsuit doesn't affect FreeBSD. I can't remember the story but earlier > on AT&T filed a slightly similar legal action against FreeBSD and lost > (IIRC, it turned out that AT&T also violated the BSD License themselves > by removing copyright notices and all that). > > -- > Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph> +63(2)8123151 > Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc. +63(917)4458925 > "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. > It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:36:12 +0800 > From: "Mark M. Barrios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] nat/routing > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > is eth0 your internal interface? > > try > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -d > <whateverpublicipblockyouhave> -j ACCEPT > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -j SNAT --to > 203.131.4.1 > > so that connections to your other public ips dont get SNATed > > whats your routing table look like? > > on gw1 you should have a route that says connections to 203.177.3.1 and > 203.177.3.2(?) should be routed to 192.168.57.2 > > and something similar on gw2 so that connections can get back > > HTH > > Sandy T. Santos wrote: > > need help about static routing and nat. when i apply static routing rules > > on my linux gateway, packets destined for my public servers which is > > connected to my other linux gateway are going fine however when i turned > > on nat on my first gateway, packets destined to my public servers would > > have to go around my first gateway->internet->public servers. here's my > > iptables rule on my first gw: > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -d ! 203.177.3.2 > > -j SNAT --to 203.131.4.1 > > > > 203.177.3.2 - public servers ip > > 203.177.3.1 - ip add of gw2 connected to isp2 > > 192.168.57.2 - 2nd ip add of gw2 > > 203.131.4.1 - ip add of gw1 connected to isp1 > > 192.168.57.1 - 2nd ip add of gw1 > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:39:16 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'm obviously not Orly but you should read more Dilbert. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Miguel de Leon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:30 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > > > > uhm, Orly, what's a PHB? :) > > > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:15, Orlando Andico wrote: > > > You are right about using BSD. However any hypothetical "chilling > > effect" > > > would be extended, in the minds of the PHB's, to *ALL* open-source > > > software. > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Mosaic Communications, Inc. > > > > > > -- > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > > . > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > . > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > > > > > > > > -- > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > . > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > . > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > From: "RReyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:14:08 +0800 > Subject: [plug] Re: automatic logout > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > I'm using Linux Slackware 8.1 on our Dragon IDS appliance and I want to > configure automatic log-out of Administrator account after defined length of > inactivity. Can someone help me to do this in Linux Slackware 8.1? > > Best regards, > Rolex > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Subject: RE: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > From: Miguel de Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 05 Jun 2003 14:18:03 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Pointy Haired Boss! haha! thanks for the tip. > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm obviously not Orly but you should read more Dilbert. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Miguel de Leon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:30 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > > > > > > uhm, Orly, what's a PHB? :) > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:15, Orlando Andico wrote: > > > > You are right about using BSD. However any hypothetical "chilling > > > effect" > > > > would be extended, in the minds of the PHB's, to *ALL* open-source > > > > software. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Mosaic Communications, Inc. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > > > . > > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > > . > > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > > . > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > . > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > -- > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > . > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > . > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: Re: [plug] Re: automatic logout > From: Mike Liguit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 05 Jun 2003 14:14:40 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Try this. > > In your administrator's account home directory (/root in the case of the > root account), edit the file .bash_profile and put the line before the > "export" line. > > TMOUT=600 #(number of seconds inactivity before logout) > > then include TMOUT in the "export" line for the TMOUT variable to be > included. Like this > > export PATH USERNAME BASH_ENV TMOUT > > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 14:14, RReyes wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using Linux Slackware 8.1 on our Dragon IDS appliance and I want to > > configure automatic log-out of Administrator account after defined length of > > inactivity. Can someone help me to do this in Linux Slackware 8.1? > > > > Best regards, > > Rolex > > > > -- > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > > . > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > . > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:47:51 +0800 > From: ian perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] Firewall before a NAT machine > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jun Tanamal wrote: > > > > > > > fooler wrote: > > > >> show to us the current topology and your expected topology that > >> you want > >> to achieve... im sure lots of here will give you good solution :-> > > > > > > Here's my current setup: > > > > Internet ---> router ---> switch ---> Old all-in-one machine --->LAN1 > > \--->LAN2 > > > > Here's what I wanted: > > > > Internet--->router--->switch--->Firewall/NAT--->Old machine--->LAN1 > > \--->LAN2 > > *the Old all-in-one machine has the ff: > > DNS, DHCP, firewall/NAT, Apache, Postfix, Proftp, Postgresql, and others. > > > > -Jun > > > hello > > how about linux bridge with iptables > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ap-bridge-fw.en.html > http://bridge.sourceforge.net/ > > > cheers, > > ian perez > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:57:12 +0800 > From: Joel Realubit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [plug] PS2 cluster > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > check this out, a Playstation 2 linux cluster: > > http://arrakis.ncsa.uiuc.edu/ps2/cluster.php > > :-) > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > From: "Marc Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:41:20 +0800 > Organization: Satellcom Network, Inc. > Subject: [plug] Restrict command in shell > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dear All, > > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific > commands? > > example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget > and all other command are disabled. > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > Thank you very much, > Marc > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:55:32 +0800 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: "Reynald I. Ngo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > At 03:41 PM 6/5/2003 +0800, Marc Chan wrote: > > sudo would be your friend. > > >Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific > >commands? > >example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while > > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget > >and all other command are disabled. > >Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > --- > Cheers, > > Reynald I. Ngo > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:05:38 +0800 > From: Brian Baquiran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Marc Chan wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific > > commands? > > > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > Or the obvious answer: user groups and filesystem permissions. > > Brian > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > From: "Miranda, Joel Louie M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [plug] Restrict command in shell > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:09:19 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes you can restrict shell access. > If you want to do it manually to learn the tricks its much better. > Kaysa sa mga OS na meron nang ganung features. Pero madali lang > Ung concept, pero dapat maingat ka. Kse Security concerns mo na > Rin if u want to limit commands. > > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > Kasama ito sa settings mo, make ur own bin directory > Tanggalin mo sa .bashrc, .bash_profile, .profile, etc yan. > Mag lagay ka lang nang isang directory ex. > > /home/louie/bin > > Add mo ito sa .profile mo for $PATH tapos copy mo ung mga gusto mong > Commands lang sa /bin/ papuntang $home/louie/bin mo. > > Test mo kung bash ka type mo sa keyboard ung tab two times para makita ung > mga commands. > > Then if you want to make it much secure na nde nila ma access yung > /bin mo then chmod 700 /bin para root lang may hawak nang ibang commands, > make it sure na I filter mo maigi ung mga commands kse most applications in > unix e hinahanap ung mga para bang system commands to run properly. Its big > work pero you're gaining knowledge on that part. Hehe :) > > Ung ps,netstat,ls,etc na command pede mo din I restrict nasa /proc lang yan, > pero that's a different story ;) hehe. > > Also check /sbin/ /usr/sbin, etc lahat nang mga bin :) > > This is my opinion abt secure shell :) > Antayin mo na din ung iba. :) > > Thanks, > Louie > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [plug] Restrict command in shell > > > Dear All, > > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific > commands? > > example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget > and all other command are disabled. > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > Thank you very much, > Marc > > > -- > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > . > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > From: "Miranda, Joel Louie M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [plug] Restrict command in shell > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:10:48 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yup, sudo din will do fine. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: \> sudo vi /etc/shadow > > Hehe :) > > -- > Thanks, > Louie > > -----Original Message----- > From: Reynald I. Ngo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell > > > At 03:41 PM 6/5/2003 +0800, Marc Chan wrote: > > sudo would be your friend. > > >Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific > >commands? example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while > > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget > >and all other command are disabled. > >Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ? > > --- > Cheers, > > Reynald I. Ngo > > -- > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > . > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 01:45:52 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > From: Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Quoting Jimmy Lim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Another article from *BSD..... > > http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200306/dadvocate.html > > Recommended. I know Greg Lehey, and he really knows his stuff. > > -- > Cheers, Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est. > Rick Moen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --__--__-- > > Message: 16 > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 01:58:35 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO > From: Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Quoting CYWare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Disturbing is an understatement! Would you or anyone know if this lawsuit > > affects FreeBSD? > > Only in the indirect sense that the same sort of vague legal charges > could be used to cast a shadow of doubt over them in order to extract > payments from some deep-pockets defendents and/or drive up a failing > firm's stock price so that the officers can sell before the firm > collapses. Greg Lehey talks about this in the Daemon's Advocate story > cited elsewhere in this thread > (http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200306/dadvocate.html). > > -- > Cheers, Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est. > Rick Moen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > plug mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > End of plug Digest -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
