Create one, then. Something like this.
# .bash_profile
# Get the aliases and functions
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
. ~/.bashrc
fi
# User specific environment and startup programs
PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin
BASH_ENV=$HOME/.bashrc
USERNAME="root"
TMOUT=300
export USERNAME BASH_ENV PATH TMOUT
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 17:50, RReyes wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> There was no file like .bash_profile in the root directory.
>
> Rolex
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:56 PM
> Subject: plug digest, Vol 1 #2466 - 16 msgs
>
>
> > Send plug mailing list submissions to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of plug digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla)
> > 2. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla)
> > 3. Re: nat/routing (Mark M. Barrios)
> > 4. RE: John C. Dvorak on SCO ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > 5. Re: automatic logout (RReyes)
> > 6. RE: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Miguel de Leon)
> > 7. Re: Re: automatic logout (Mike Liguit)
> > 8. Re: Firewall before a NAT machine (ian perez)
> > 9. PS2 cluster (Joel Realubit)
> > 10. Restrict command in shell (Marc Chan)
> > 11. Re: Restrict command in shell (Reynald I. Ngo)
> > 12. Re: Restrict command in shell (Brian Baquiran)
> > 13. RE: Restrict command in shell (Miranda, Joel Louie M)
> > 14. RE: Restrict command in shell (Miranda, Joel Louie M)
> > 15. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rick Moen)
> > 16. Re: John C. Dvorak on SCO (Rick Moen)
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:32:57 +0800
> > From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:08:01PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> > > Dvorak: And what happens if there is an out-of-court settlement and IBM
> > > does some under-the-table deal and suddenly emerges as the top Linux
> > > vendor with the only legal license to use certain aspects of the
> kernel?
> > > Reality: The moment those "aspects" are identified, all code that might
> > > be encumbered gets discarded and rewritten from scratch.
> > >
> >
> > Another Reality: Dvorak has never read the GPL. IBM cannot get a legal
> > license "to use certain aspects of the kernel" without licensing it
> > free of charge to anyone and everyone. If they attempted to do so,
> > Torvalds and the rest of the Linux kernel developers could sue them
> > for copyright violation, as they would then be in violation of the GPL
> > and be distributing the kernel without a license.
> >
> > --
> > Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph> +63(2)8123151
> > Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc. +63(917)4458925
> > "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
> > It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves."
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:38:28 +0800
> > From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:46:36AM +0800, CYWare wrote:
> > > Disturbing is an understatement! Would you or anyone know if this
> lawsuit
> > > affects FreeBSD?
> >
> > Disturbing is an overstatement. As usual Dvorak is being alarmist. The
> > lawsuit doesn't affect FreeBSD. I can't remember the story but earlier
> > on AT&T filed a slightly similar legal action against FreeBSD and lost
> > (IIRC, it turned out that AT&T also violated the BSD License themselves
> > by removing copyright notices and all that).
> >
> > --
> > Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph> +63(2)8123151
> > Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc. +63(917)4458925
> > "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
> > It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves."
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:36:12 +0800
> > From: "Mark M. Barrios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] nat/routing
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > is eth0 your internal interface?
> >
> > try
> >
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -d
> > <whateverpublicipblockyouhave> -j ACCEPT
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -j SNAT --to
> > 203.131.4.1
> >
> > so that connections to your other public ips dont get SNATed
> >
> > whats your routing table look like?
> >
> > on gw1 you should have a route that says connections to 203.177.3.1 and
> > 203.177.3.2(?) should be routed to 192.168.57.2
> >
> > and something similar on gw2 so that connections can get back
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Sandy T. Santos wrote:
> > > need help about static routing and nat. when i apply static routing
> rules
> > > on my linux gateway, packets destined for my public servers which is
> > > connected to my other linux gateway are going fine however when i turned
> > > on nat on my first gateway, packets destined to my public servers would
> > > have to go around my first gateway->internet->public servers. here's my
> > > iptables rule on my first gw:
> > >
> > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.57.0/24 -d !
> 203.177.3.2
> > > -j SNAT --to 203.131.4.1
> > >
> > > 203.177.3.2 - public servers ip
> > > 203.177.3.1 - ip add of gw2 connected to isp2
> > > 192.168.57.2 - 2nd ip add of gw2
> > > 203.131.4.1 - ip add of gw1 connected to isp1
> > > 192.168.57.1 - 2nd ip add of gw1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 4
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:39:16 +0800
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I'm obviously not Orly but you should read more Dilbert.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Miguel de Leon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:30 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > >
> > > uhm, Orly, what's a PHB? :)
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:15, Orlando Andico wrote:
> > > > You are right about using BSD. However any hypothetical "chilling
> > > effect"
> > > > would be extended, in the minds of the PHB's, to *ALL* open-source
> > > > software.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Mosaic Communications, Inc.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > > .
> > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > > .
> > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > .
> > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > .
> > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 5
> > From: "RReyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:14:08 +0800
> > Subject: [plug] Re: automatic logout
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using Linux Slackware 8.1 on our Dragon IDS appliance and I want to
> > configure automatic log-out of Administrator account after defined length
> of
> > inactivity. Can someone help me to do this in Linux Slackware 8.1?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Rolex
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Subject: RE: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > From: Miguel de Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: 05 Jun 2003 14:18:03 +0800
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Pointy Haired Boss! haha! thanks for the tip.
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm obviously not Orly but you should read more Dilbert.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Miguel de Leon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:30 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > > >
> > > > uhm, Orly, what's a PHB? :)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:15, Orlando Andico wrote:
> > > > > You are right about using BSD. However any hypothetical "chilling
> > > > effect"
> > > > > would be extended, in the minds of the PHB's, to *ALL* open-source
> > > > > software.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Mosaic Communications, Inc.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > > > .
> > > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > > > .
> > > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > > .
> > > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > > .
> > > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> > > --
> > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > .
> > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > .
> > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Subject: Re: [plug] Re: automatic logout
> > From: Mike Liguit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: 05 Jun 2003 14:14:40 +0800
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Try this.
> >
> > In your administrator's account home directory (/root in the case of the
> > root account), edit the file .bash_profile and put the line before the
> > "export" line.
> >
> > TMOUT=600 #(number of seconds inactivity before logout)
> >
> > then include TMOUT in the "export" line for the TMOUT variable to be
> > included. Like this
> >
> > export PATH USERNAME BASH_ENV TMOUT
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 14:14, RReyes wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm using Linux Slackware 8.1 on our Dragon IDS appliance and I want to
> > > configure automatic log-out of Administrator account after defined
> length of
> > > inactivity. Can someone help me to do this in Linux Slackware 8.1?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Rolex
> > >
> > > --
> > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> > > .
> > > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > .
> > > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> >
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:47:51 +0800
> > From: ian perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] Firewall before a NAT machine
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Jun Tanamal wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > fooler wrote:
> > >
> > >> show to us the current topology and your expected topology that
> > >> you want
> > >> to achieve... im sure lots of here will give you good solution :->
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's my current setup:
> > >
> > > Internet ---> router ---> switch ---> Old all-in-one machine --->LAN1
> > > \--->LAN2
> > >
> > > Here's what I wanted:
> > >
> > > Internet--->router--->switch--->Firewall/NAT--->Old machine--->LAN1
> > > \--->LAN2
> > > *the Old all-in-one machine has the ff:
> > > DNS, DHCP, firewall/NAT, Apache, Postfix, Proftp, Postgresql, and
> others.
> > >
> > > -Jun
> > >
> > hello
> >
> > how about linux bridge with iptables
> >
> >
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ap-bridge-fw.en.html
> > http://bridge.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > ian perez
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:57:12 +0800
> > From: Joel Realubit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [plug] PS2 cluster
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > check this out, a Playstation 2 linux cluster:
> >
> > http://arrakis.ncsa.uiuc.edu/ps2/cluster.php
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 10
> > From: "Marc Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:41:20 +0800
> > Organization: Satellcom Network, Inc.
> > Subject: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific
> > commands?
> >
> > example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while
> > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget
> > and all other command are disabled.
> >
> > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Marc
> >
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:55:32 +0800
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: "Reynald I. Ngo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > At 03:41 PM 6/5/2003 +0800, Marc Chan wrote:
> >
> > sudo would be your friend.
> >
> > >Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific
> > >commands?
> > >example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while
> > > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget
> > >and all other command are disabled.
> > >Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > ---
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Reynald I. Ngo
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 12
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:05:38 +0800
> > From: Brian Baquiran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Marc Chan wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific
> > > commands?
> > >
> > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > Or the obvious answer: user groups and filesystem permissions.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 13
> > From: "Miranda, Joel Louie M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:09:19 +0800
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Yes you can restrict shell access.
> > If you want to do it manually to learn the tricks its much better.
> > Kaysa sa mga OS na meron nang ganung features. Pero madali lang
> > Ung concept, pero dapat maingat ka. Kse Security concerns mo na
> > Rin if u want to limit commands.
> >
> > > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > Kasama ito sa settings mo, make ur own bin directory
> > Tanggalin mo sa .bashrc, .bash_profile, .profile, etc yan.
> > Mag lagay ka lang nang isang directory ex.
> >
> > /home/louie/bin
> >
> > Add mo ito sa .profile mo for $PATH tapos copy mo ung mga gusto mong
> > Commands lang sa /bin/ papuntang $home/louie/bin mo.
> >
> > Test mo kung bash ka type mo sa keyboard ung tab two times para makita ung
> > mga commands.
> >
> > Then if you want to make it much secure na nde nila ma access yung
> > /bin mo then chmod 700 /bin para root lang may hawak nang ibang commands,
> > make it sure na I filter mo maigi ung mga commands kse most applications
> in
> > unix e hinahanap ung mga para bang system commands to run properly. Its
> big
> > work pero you're gaining knowledge on that part. Hehe :)
> >
> > Ung ps,netstat,ls,etc na command pede mo din I restrict nasa /proc lang
> yan,
> > pero that's a different story ;) hehe.
> >
> > Also check /sbin/ /usr/sbin, etc lahat nang mga bin :)
> >
> > This is my opinion abt secure shell :)
> > Antayin mo na din ung iba. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Louie
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific
> > commands?
> >
> > example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while
> > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget
> > and all other command are disabled.
> >
> > Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Marc
> >
> >
> > --
> > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > .
> > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 14
> > From: "Miranda, Joel Louie M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:10:48 +0800
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Yup, sudo din will do fine.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: \> sudo vi /etc/shadow
> >
> > Hehe :)
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Louie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Reynald I. Ngo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:56 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] Restrict command in shell
> >
> >
> > At 03:41 PM 6/5/2003 +0800, Marc Chan wrote:
> >
> > sudo would be your friend.
> >
> > >Can I restrict my users with shell accounts to access only specific
> > >commands? example : user 1 can only access cp, rm, mv while
> > > user 2 can access cp, rm, mv, pico and wget
> > >and all other command are disabled.
> > >Any ideas on .bashrc?? or .bash_profile? or ?
> >
> > ---
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Reynald I. Ngo
> >
> > --
> > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > .
> > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 15
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 01:45:52 -0700
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > From: Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Quoting Jimmy Lim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Another article from *BSD.....
> > > http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200306/dadvocate.html
> >
> > Recommended. I know Greg Lehey, and he really knows his stuff.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est.
> > Rick Moen
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 16
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 01:58:35 -0700
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [plug] John C. Dvorak on SCO
> > From: Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Quoting CYWare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Disturbing is an understatement! Would you or anyone know if this
> lawsuit
> > > affects FreeBSD?
> >
> > Only in the indirect sense that the same sort of vague legal charges
> > could be used to cast a shadow of doubt over them in order to extract
> > payments from some deep-pockets defendents and/or drive up a failing
> > firm's stock price so that the officers can sell before the firm
> > collapses. Greg Lehey talks about this in the Daemon's Advocate story
> > cited elsewhere in this thread
> > (http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200306/dadvocate.html).
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est.
> > Rick Moen
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > plug mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> >
> >
> > End of plug Digest
>
> --
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
> Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
> .
> To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
> .
> Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
> http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
