Quoting Jared Odulio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > That's the proper comparison, now you're learning! ;-) Am I being obtuse > then?
If you failed to notice that the results are unchanged, yes. > Again, it's in the stuff you instantiated in the first place. Have I > missed that point? You seem to have missed the point about bloat and sluggishness. MUAs written in GTK+/C (Balsa, Cronos II, Paranoy, Spruce, Sylpheed), or FLTK/C++ (Post Office), or WINGS/C (Aileron, YPMail.app), or GNUstep/Obj-C (GNUMail.app), or GTK+/wxWindows/Python (Mahogany), or GTK+/Perl (Pronto, SoapyMailer) are all many times lighter and faster than any of the Java ones. Heck, even the Qt/C++ ones (Aethera, Kiltdown, Liamail) can typically manage a 2-to-3-times improvement. > If that is how Grendel, ICEMail or whatever was bloatedly > programmed to be. It's obvious it's not Java's problem. Yeah, I notice the list of things that are "not Java's problem" keeps growing. ;-> -- Cheers, Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est. Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
