seems more alarmist than disturbing. btw, i was wondering if the outcome of this case would be limited to the US? secondly, can't the offending code be rewritten? (my apologies in advance if these have been answered already).
migs On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 09:43, Orlando Andico wrote: > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1115156,00.asp > > He does make several very good points. Disturbing. > > > --- > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mosaic Communications, Inc. > > -- > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph > Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph > . > To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > . > Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie > -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
