Rick Moen wrote:
There's nothing wrong with the rpm package format; it's intrinsically
about the same as .deb with only minor differences.
some of the things you cant do when packaging a DEB compared to an RPM:
a. file-based dependency check b. trigger install/uninstall (but there's a workaround)
some of the things you cant do when packaging an RPM compared to a DEB:
a. interactive installation/uninstallation scripts (for me, it's a must!) b. faking packages (but you can on files)
-- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
