Quoting Radamanthus Batnag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I'm looking for replies along the lines of: > > 1. Windows 2003 crypto isn't strong enough. It's puny 40-bit encryption > that can be cracked by > a P4 2GHz in half a day. It's almost useless.
I'll be delighted to examine Windows 2003's crypto filesystem. This will require, as per standard practice for any analysis of crypto implementations, that you send me the source code. All serious contenders for a reliable implementation must, of course, do that. Just ask Bruce Schneier, Matt Blaze, or any other respected cryptographer. > 2. Setting up and supporting a encrypting linux filesystem isn't that > hard, many people have been there > and done that, and you'll find plenty of support in case you get into > trouble. As I said, I've had excellent experience (modulo predictable slowness) with SFS, the Self-Certifying Filesystem. -- Cheers, The cynics among us might say: "We laugh, Rick Moen monkeyboys -- Linux IS the mainstream UNIX now! [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuaHaHaHa!" but that would be rude. -- Jim Dennis -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
