Binaries cannot be smaller because QT is natively compiled. It needs to link with WIN32 components (kernel32.exe, advapi.dll etc...)
Mabuhay On Tuesday 28 October 2003 21:51, Daniel O. Escasa wrote: > Sabi ni Carlos noong Thu, 23 Oct 2003: > > For GUI applications, QT is probably the best. We recently completed a > > port of our Windows apps to QT. The binary sizes and speeds are the same > > as their C++/WIN32 couterparts. In addition, coding a GUI app in QT is a > > lot easier > > Same sizes? Uhm, I don't exactly consider that a ringing endorsement, > considering the bloat of the average Win32 executable. Was hoping the > binaries would be smaller, by at least 25%. Still... > > Mabuhay. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
