On Thursday 23 October 2003 6:57 am, Carlos J Yu wrote: > For GUI applications, QT is probably the best. We recently completed a > port of our Windows apps to QT. The binary sizes and speeds are the same > as their C++/WIN32 couterparts. In addition, coding a GUI app in QT is a > lot easier than coding in MFC or JAVA. Finally, native, efficient and > small > cross-platform binaries are produced (8MB of C++ code fits in a diskette > once compiled with no external dependencies i.e. runtime environments, > DLL's or shared object libraries not present in the target OS).
I agree. Qt is a lot easier to code, efficient, and fast. The signals to slot mechanism is an intriguing concept that lends some programming flexibility. Java AWT can be optimized, and I feel that's the reason why developers would love to open-source java with a GPL license. In the meantime, Qt gets the care and attention of great open-source developers. optimus -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
