On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. > Have you tried looking at an actual SOAP message? Text-based it may be, > but it's about as human-readable as the crud that MS Word's HTML > exporter produces.
No, I find it *quite* human-readable. MS .NET produces nicer-looking SOAP envelopes than SOAP::Lite, in fact. > And in that case, if a person can't easily parse it > visually, then what advantage does it give to offset the major > disadvantages like up to an order of magnitude more bandwidth > consumption? Well I *can* parse it visually. And WSDL is really great. Too bad SOAP::Lite isn't THAT smart when it comes to consuming services based on their WSDL alone.. --- Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mosaic Communications, Inc. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
