On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:55:05PM +0800, Miguel A Paraz wrote: > Some benchmarks copying a gigabyte (1024**3 bytes) file, no > compression, over a LAN: > - scp (3des) no tunnel - 01:34 > - scp (blowfish) over tunnel (blowfish), 02:23 > - scp (blowfish) over tunnel (3des), 02:31 > - scp (3des) over tunnel (blowfish), 02:36 > - scp (3des) over tunnel (3des), 03:26 > > And surprise, sftp has the worst performance! > - sftp (3des) - 03:37 > > I tried the 'fish' (Files over SSH) mode of lftp, which is supposed to > be the same as sftp, but the same file was estimated to take over 2 > hours!
I'm assuming that bandwidth was fairly a non-issue as far as the LAN you tested with is concerned. It must be a CPU issue, then. Can we have some insights on the CPU speed of each endpoint and the tunnel, and the CPU utilization of each test? --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : jijo.free.net.ph : When we speak of free software GNU/Linux Specialist : GnuPG 0x93B746BE : we refer to freedom, not price. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
