Susan doesn't exist. Those were spam emails, not an actuarial person. On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:41 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday, I saw three messages on plug list that were very provocative. I > use plug because I am a computer scientist and I have an expectation that > sexually provocative messages won't be there. I believe Susan is in the > archive for yesterday 3 times. I am formally requesting that her comments > which seemed very direct be removed from the archive. I have a problem with > her hey sweetie prove to me that you are real and her, I have a husband so > don't respond to me here. A decent man might complain a bit, but not be > affected in any way. Frankly, the comments are suggestive and creepy too. > The terms of use should bar sexually suggestive comments on plug. If they > don't, I will have to find another list that will moderate this out. At > best the comments are a crude and inappropriate joke. At worst, someone is > trying to create a problem for me specifically or men on the list more > generally. Meanwhile, I need to see about engaging squid again with a url > list of anything that opendns w! > on't filt > er out that I can't forget. I disengaged squid and dansguardian because > they weren't working well and my hard drive was filling up. > > -- Michael C. Robinson > > Apologies for putting this on the list, I can't reach the list manager. > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
