Sorry for my typo. Meant to write: Those were spam emails, not an actual person.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:47 AM elcaseti . <[email protected]> wrote: > Susan doesn't exist. Those were spam emails, not an actuarial person. > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:41 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yesterday, I saw three messages on plug list that were very provocative. >> I use plug because I am a computer scientist and I have an expectation that >> sexually provocative messages won't be there. I believe Susan is in the >> archive for yesterday 3 times. I am formally requesting that her comments >> which seemed very direct be removed from the archive. I have a problem with >> her hey sweetie prove to me that you are real and her, I have a husband so >> don't respond to me here. A decent man might complain a bit, but not be >> affected in any way. Frankly, the comments are suggestive and creepy too. >> The terms of use should bar sexually suggestive comments on plug. If they >> don't, I will have to find another list that will moderate this out. At >> best the comments are a crude and inappropriate joke. At worst, someone is >> trying to create a problem for me specifically or men on the list more >> generally. Meanwhile, I need to see about engaging squid again with a url >> list of anything that opendns w! >> on't filt >> er out that I can't forget. I disengaged squid and dansguardian because >> they weren't working well and my hard drive was filling up. >> >> -- Michael C. Robinson >> >> Apologies for putting this on the list, I can't reach the list manager. >> _______________________________________________ >> PLUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug >> > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
