I locked down the spammer's address immediately after the spam was sent. If the frequency of this continues to increase, we may need to look into stronger verifications prior to admission to the list.
-wes On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:44 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Yesterday, I saw three messages on plug list that were very provocative. I > use plug because I am a computer scientist and I have an expectation that > sexually provocative messages won't be there. I believe Susan is in the > archive for yesterday 3 times. I am formally requesting that her comments > which seemed very direct be removed from the archive. I have a problem with > her hey sweetie prove to me that you are real and her, I have a husband so > don't respond to me here. A decent man might complain a bit, but not be > affected in any way. Frankly, the comments are suggestive and creepy too. > The terms of use should bar sexually suggestive comments on plug. If they > don't, I will have to find another list that will moderate this out. At > best the comments are a crude and inappropriate joke. At worst, someone is > trying to create a problem for me specifically or men on the list more > generally. Meanwhile, I need to see about engaging squid again with a url > list of anything that opendns w! > on't filt > er out that I can't forget. I disengaged squid and dansguardian because > they weren't working well and my hard drive was filling up. > > -- Michael C. Robinson > > Apologies for putting this on the list, I can't reach the list manager. > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
