On Jul 13, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
This smells like the language snobbery that we had at the plug
meeting a
while back. It's all about ego (some egos being *quite* large).
If you
can't convince your nerdy friends that you're smart then what do you
have?
Me, I don't give a rat's tail. I know I'm numb and don't feel the
need
to prove otherwise. Give me what works and what works well; I'll use
it. I'll look at the other languages for fun but go back to what I
know
to make things work.
Claiming that all languages are not equal is not necessarily
'language snobbery' at all. If that were the case, we'd all still be
using Fortran. Because once you have a language that abstracts
beyond assembly language, they're all the same anyway, right? No one
needs recursion, objects, or any of this new-fangled stuff anyway.
Maybe you look at Algol for fun, but you go back to Fortran because
you know it and it gets the job done!
Just because you've only been exposed to languages that work with the
same paradigms doesn't mean that they're all the same. And if you
don't move on with the state of the art, you're going to find out
you're using the equivalent of Fortran in the age of C.
--Levi
.===================================.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`==================================='
