On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 at 09:33 -0700, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:28:55 -0600, "Hans Fugal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I wouldn't go so far, in any case, as to say that TMTOWTDI has been > > conclusively proven to be a Bad Thing. > > Yeah, but you're a sysadmin. :)
Who happens to have a BS in CS and is headed for grad school in CS. > The only difference between good code and bad code is exactly "what it > looks like inside." Perl5 makes it easy to write bad code and from what > I've seen of perl6 that won't change. Yeah, but you're a programmer. ;-) The real world mostly cares about what your program DOES. If perl programmers prduce a good volume of working quality programs, perl can't be all bad. Not conclusively proven bad, anyway. -- .O. Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. ..O http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg OOO | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach --------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95 CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.-----------------------------------. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `-----------------------------------'
