On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:35:04 -0700, "Gregory Hill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
um...
bush guard national guard forgery...?
Ok, just did a very quick googling about this and unless I'm reading
wrong, all of the forgery accusations were based on the "fact" that no
typewriter available at the time could have written the documents.
But
that "fact" was debunked by many people citing IBM typewriter models
that could easily have been used to create the documents (and they
were
typewriters sold primarily to government). Am I missing something?
Was
there ever definitive evidence that the document were forged? As I
said, it was a very quick googling.
http://www.flounder.com/bush2.htm
And another:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/10/national/main665727.shtml
Grant
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
