On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:02:44 -0800, Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 01:46 -0700, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
argue that one language is more secure over the other. In this case,
however, it all comes down to you and your ability to write properly
documented, secured, and designed code.
I'm an ardent PHP hater, but Ryan is right. Use the tool you know best.
I'm going to agree here as well. The language you know is going to be
better for a multitude of reasons than the language you don't know. And
perl and PHP *really* aren't /that/ different. (Oops, I hope I didn't just
fan the flames.)
And during the evenings, instead of watching TV, repent and learn Ruby.
Or Python. Or Perl. But not Java, because while it's a much better
designed language than PHP, it's still evil. As for C++... it should be
obvious to any right thinking person that C++ is at least an order of
magnitude more evil than PHP or Java.
Stuart, are there *any* statically typed languages that you don't think
are evil? Haskell?
~ Ross
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
