I've heard the rumor too, but I can't remember where. All I know is I'm
not switching to $() until vim stops highlighting them red.

On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 at 12:54 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:16:26AM -0600, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 09:58 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > > > Why?
> > > 
> > > Because
> 
> > > * Back ticks are deprecated, and in future may be used for something
> > >   else.
> > I've never heard of this.  Interesting.
> 
> > I'd be interested in reading about the back tick being deprecated.
> > Any links?  I'll just google if not.
> 
> I thought I had read that in Newham and Rosenblatt, Learning the Bash
> Shell, O'Reilly,2nd. ed., but on a quick search I don't see it. They
> do refer to it as "archaic" (Table 1-6). In a footnote on page 103
> they say it is there for backward compatibility. The man page is
> silent on deprecation. So I could be wrong on that.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
> and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
> http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email
> 
> Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB



> 
> /*
> PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
> Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
> Don't fear the penguin.
> */

-- 
Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net
 
There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the 
right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
    -- Johann Sebastian Bach

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

Reply via email to