On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:04 -0600, Dave Smith wrote:
> I'm assuming that since Thunderbird didn't report any errors, it worked 
> at least as far as Thunderbird can tell. And yes, I did run mail -v on 
> the mail server, and yes, I use TLS for my Thunderbird SMTP connection. 
> In /var/log/mail.log (using Debian/Postfix), I see that the message sent 
> by Thunderbird was accepted in the same way that the mail -v message was 
> accepted.

Sorry, I was distracted and not thinking straight when I suggested
sniffing Thunderbird. Of course it's being accepted by your mail server.
We're trying to figure out why it's being ignored by the other guy.

I assume the mail -v message didn't make it to the final destination,
just like the Thunderbird message didn't? Short or raw SMTP, with
nothing in the logs, the only thing I can think of is mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and asking what's up.

-- 
Stuart Jansen              e-mail/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                           google talk:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at 
the results." -- Winston Churchill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

Reply via email to