On Feb 6, 2008 3:07 PM, Chris Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another interesting thing in the ars technica article is that it says > that it is no longer is limited to business. > > "If you live in Orem and your next-door neighbor's kid uses your open > WAP to look at pictures of naked women, you could find yourself on the > hook for a $1,000 fine. Yarro thinks that's fine, telling the Tribune > that people "should be responsible for their barking dogs and their > Internet access.""
Read more carefully. Yarro is behind CP80 which has always advocated this kind of individual liability. Nothing has changed in the proposed legislation yet. Nothing. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
