On Feb 7, 2008 9:35 AM, Thad Van Ry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 9:27 AM, Nathan Blackham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So If I put up a page that they have to agree to that says, If you are a > > minor you can use it. And they have to click ok, does that count as > > restricting access? > > Why do people seem so reluctant to read the bill? It can be found here: > http://tinyurl.com/2mbwjl > The bill states the ways that age can be verified, currently it states > only viewing government issued ID or asking for credit card > information. > The bill is not that hard to understand and it's only 76 lines of > text. I recommend everyone read it before commenting on this thread. > Thad >
Wow, after reading it, I see that it is a horribly written bill. The definition of restricting access still makes my question valid though. The bill says you either have to ascertain the age or restrict access (Sec. 13.46.102.4). But I guess it isn't relevant unless the bill gets passed. Nathan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
