- Kimball
http://www.kimballlarsen.com
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
On 24 Mar 2008, at 10:20, Von Fugal wrote:
<quote name="Levi Pearson" date="Fri, 21 Mar 2008 at 14:53 -0600">
I agree with the goal of the above system, but it does have a flaw
with respect to another important property of a voting system. It
should be impossible to definitively associate a person with the
particular votes they cast after they leave the voting booth. This
prevents coerced voting and vote selling, since it becomes
impossible
to verify that the votes were cast as the voter claims.
I feel kinda silly, but I've never heard or thought of the vote
selling
side of it. I merely focused on the coercion side, it's impossible
for
others to know what you voted. Indeed, it's also important that you
cannot verify who you voted for after the fact. Although as you state
below, it should be possible to verify that it wasn't changed!
I believe that the above property can be combined with assurance
that
your vote is tallied without tampering, and I think I've read a
paper
on a system that provides a method, but I don't recall the details.
Thanks Levi for that thoughtful and informative post.
I am lazy. I want to stay on my couch in my living room with my
laptop comfortably on my lap. I want to vote from a web site that I
can access from anywhere. That way if I am in Tahiti on election
day, I can still vote. That way, if I am in the military, I do not
have to vote "Absentee". This is the time of that big Intarweb
thing. Why not use it? Nobody checks my identity when I vote at
current polling stations. Voting online could be just as secure or
insecure. Keep some polling stations open with a laptop available
for people who just have not gotten around to buying one of those
durnfangled comp u tarz and downloading that In Tar Web thing onto
it. Or better yet, just tell people to go to the library. Why
purchase more equipment for voting. Most people have the equipment
they need already. Just make one fool proof web site, probably cost
the same amount of money as all those polling machines and manning
the polling stations.
Heh. You said "fool-proof website".
-- Kimball
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
