On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Dennis Muhlestein <[email protected]>wrote:
> Brad Dorner wrote: > > It was not in accord with one of the attorneys. After about 5 minutes of > yelling. I say yelling because I could hear both attorneys from across the > court room. The judge finally agreed with the other attorney and let me go > from the selection process. I don't know what the final result of the legal > action was but I got the impression that the lie detector test was a big > part of the one attorneys case, and for me to call it in question was a slap > in the face for him. > > > > How is this "lying during the selection process"? From the way you tell > it, it sounds to me like you just stated what you thought. > > Maybe the attorney had such a strong belief in lie detectors that the idea someone disagreed with them seemed completely ridiculous and an obvious attempt to get out of serving as a juror. Like as if Brad had expressed the doubt that guns were capable of being used as murder weapons. Joshua. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
