Sometime not going to it is not an option. Mistype a url or you think you have a correct url and bang, your eyeballs are no longer in your head or you are running across the room to protect your kids from some email that they got and should not have.
You assume that I want to be a thought cop. I would like to see all sites marked for content. That way people get to choose what they see, read, or filter. Nice clean simple. A site breaking the content tagging rules gets a warning and then shut down if not corrected. Again simple. I would not want to push my values or morals on someone else, but I don't want theirs necessarily either. Brad >>> From: Kyle Waters <[email protected]> Now here's an other great related (and almost on topic issue). The way a user filters a website is by not going to it. Are you suggesting that web developers have to mark their sites with every topic that might be on the site. Or would the marking only apply to a small set of topics that YOU find offensive. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
