On 08/04/2009 02:32 PM, Brad Dorner wrote: > Like I said before, when people are listening in on a conversation you can > never tell what they will do. My response was to illustrate that the attitude > of "if you are doing nothing wrong why do you care" is bogus. An attorneys > job appears to be to twist what someone says to the advantage of whatever the > attorney is supporting, to ... with the truth. Any form of thought police > will work the same way. with that being said I would also like to point out > that a complete lack of sensorship is also bad. The internet is a great > example. let people post what they may on the internet, but in a way that it > can be filtered by the users or providers. >
Now here's an other great related (and almost on topic issue). The way a user filters a website is by not going to it. Are you suggesting that web developers have to mark their sites with every topic that might be on the site. Or would the marking only apply to a small set of topics that YOU find offensive. Kyle /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
