cpd73 wrote: > Are you saying this new version is worse? Or did you mean " it doesn't > feel any better than what I saw minutes earlier, but certainly *not* > worse than what I thought I remembered." - as that's how I'd read that, > but without the "not" word its meaning is the opposite. As stated, my > implementation *is* simpler, and should be slower - but hopefully with > less bugs. > > > > Can't access for now. > > > > I have had issues in the past where the scrolling was smooth, but then > after opening some dialogs the scrolling would get very slow. Not sure > if that was an issue with the library, or my usage of (more likely). > > Anyhow, my reason for this change was the fact that the library does not > seem to be actively maintained (I reported a bug about 5 months ago), > Material contains some work-arounds for various issues (which again, > could be my usage of it). The simple method I've implemented is trivial, > and I understand its code - and it seems fast enough for me. I guess if > you were listing 25k tracks it'd be slower - but I'm not trying to match > the library, just have a usable implementation.
I think Michael is saying that on his system even the original Material skin is slow at the moment and the dev version was the same. Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109624 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
