As I stated in the initial post, this method will be *slower* than the
existing one. The question is, for -normal- usage, is it fast -enough-.

You're saying it _will_ be slower, because you lack the insight to make it as fast? Or because you know you need to do more work than the generic scroller?

Whatever the outcome of this testing: eventually it's your call. You as a developer must have good reasons to consider this switch. I hope the advantage you get is worth the hassle.

Please take my opinion as just this: one user's POV. But I personally believe this is a step back, without me as a user seeing any advantage. (Because really, before I was totally amazed by how smooth scrolling my collection was... much better than what ever I had come up with before!)

--

Michael
_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to