rkrug wrote: 
> 
> So while I always use / return to the LMS ecosystem, there is
> essentially no integration with the Apple ecosystem, apart from iPeng
> which is really great (but slightly outdated?).
> 
> I am really wondering: what is the reason, why there is no further
> integration with the Apple ecosystem? Is it because of missing Apple
> users who can also code? Is it because of the limitations of the Apple
> ecosystem? 
> 
I doubt there are enough users using LMS these days willing to pay for a
new client side iOS app, this probably makes it less interesting for
someone who have the knowledge and interest to do it for the money. The
remaining opening would be for someone who are dissatisfied with iPeng,
have the knowledge/time and want to do it for him-/herself or the
community without a need to cover the costs/hours spent. I think most
people with the knowledge are just happy enough with iPeng as long as it
works with the latest iOS devices. Making something that is better than
iPeng is going to be significant amount of work and the pricing scheme
in App Store is designed to sell to masses rather than the relatively
few geek users still participating in this community.


rkrug wrote: 
> 
> On the server side, the problem is likely more difficult, as I do not
> know if e.g. Apple Music integration could be managed from any other
> platform than a Mac. But still - it should be possible to get this
> integration for a Mac. I just saw there is at least a web API to
> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/applemusicapi (The Apple Music
> API is a web service that lets you access information about the media
> found in the Apple Music Catalog and the user's personal iCloud Music
> Library. ) and also https://developer.apple.com/documentation/musickitjs
> (MusicKit JS lets users play songs from Apple Music and their Cloud
> Library inside your JavaScript app.). 
> 
I’m pretty sure the limitation here is Apple. In theory you might be
able to hack around MusicKit JS but I’m pretty sure Apple doesn’t
legally allow you to use it to stream music to other devices, the
intention with MusicKit JS is likely just to be able to play Apple Music
in a web browser shown to the end user. Apple basically wants to be in
control on which type of devices Apple Music can be played. Licensing
services to other hardware manufacturers doesn’t seem to be part of
their business model, they want to handle the whole ecosystem themself
as long as possible. MusicKit JS likely exists only because it makes it
possible to sell Apple Music to a significant amount of Windows and
Android users. It’s not a focus area for Apple and just exists because
they would loose too many Apple Music subscribers if they didn’t offer
it.

Disregarding the legal risks someone trying to hack around MusicKit JS
would take I also doubt there are enough users who would be willing to
pay for a LMS integration to cover the development/maintenance costs.
Best hope is likely that someone tries to hack around it and offer
something for free, that could possibly make it go under the radar of
Apple lawyers. Would probably have to be done by someone who don’t care
if they get banned as Apple Developer by Apple. If you don’t charge
people for the integration Apple might be satisfied by shutting down
your integration and banning you from further development.

rkrug wrote: 
> 
> LMS is great, and I even consider getting a Qobuz subscription only for
> LMS. But I would prefer if LMS would integrate more with the Apple
> ecosystem and I would happily give the money I would pay for Qobuz to
> the further development of LMS and the LMS - Apple integration.
> 
There are probably a few more people that would pay 10-20 USD/month but
I’m pretty sure we are talking about 10-20 people rather than 100 or
1000. The situation was different 2009 when Logitech still sold
commercial Squeezebox hardware to the massmarket. Most people still feel
like a one time cost of 10 USD is a lot and the fact that there is no
massmarket Squeezebox player hardware doesn’t improve the
situation/interest.

The main reason I’m still using Spotify instead of Apple Music is that
Spotify is supported in LMS so I do have the same wish as you have but
I’m not sure I’d pay 20USD/month (10 to Apple and 10 for LMS
integration) for Apple Music.



Erland Isaksson ('My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info))
Developer of 'many plugins/applets'
(https://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/User_Erland.html)
*Starting with LMS 8.0 I no longer support my plugins/applets* ('see
here for more information'
(https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?49483-Announce-New-versions-of-erlands-plugins&p=998836&viewfull=1#post998836)
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113721

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to