ralphy;612781 Wrote: > Is that necessary? > > We could check in your code as it is if you're willing to provide it > and build at least a SoftSqueeze.jar for users to test and decide which > version works better for them. > > Thoughts?
>From the top of my head, there are several potential issues that I'd rather remove/resolve before anyone else picks up the code. eg. the pre-buffer decoding HDCD on the fly and re-sampling on the fly. It requires "shelling" out via Process (to wine and hdcd.exe - I run mostly on Linux) and is a potential support nightmare on multi platform. At the very least, I need to disable it by default. I've used a bunch of Java 1.6 features, so it's no longer backward-compatible as it stands. I also need to go back through and check several other things. eg. ISTR, that the jflac 1.3 jar was missing the spi service declarations in META-INF and there are a couple of other things I've hacked in a way I wouldn't have done for the code to be releaseable/supportable. Not least that the code is missing comments and javadoc. I never thought it would be used for anything other than my own amusement. I figure I should have enough time this week to clean it up for an initial "release". -- JackOfAll ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62060 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
