gharris999 wrote: 
> Then I really don't understand what you're suggesting.  In a couple of
> threads now, you suggest that the resume 'grace period' should be
> dropped from ReallyPreventStandby.  I just pointed out a way that could
> be done without breaking the fix for Windows XP and now you're saying
> no.  I don't get it.

This goes back to me asking if we could tell whether it was SB activity
that woke up the Mac. You said that you could not tell from the WOL. I
agreed but thought that we might be able to tell from the state of the
connected SBs.

I do want to keep the grace period if we were woken up by a user at an
LMS client device.

I do not want to keep the grace period in any other case - LMS is just
one service running on the machine. There are lots of occasions when the
Mac is woken up that have nothing to do with LMS. The corresponding
services do work to see if they are needed. So should we.

Michael Herger has an idea how it might be done and we are testing at
the moment. See BugTrack for details.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
nonnoroger's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35581
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95980

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to