pallfreeman wrote: > Increasing the cache size is (arguably) pointless if you don't have > enough physical memory for it. If you're already using virtual memory, > you don't. So I'm not quite sure how greater virtual memory helps with > performance. A faster drive, sure, but not a bigger paging space. > > Ug no understand.
My system does have the RAM for it. The system has 3 GB, and the system's primary function is as LMS. I was simply remarking that in addition to increasing the cache_size that I had noticed that the CPU used by LMS was much lower and for a much shorter time period (probably since Custom Scan isn't slogging through TrackStat), but that the virtual memory for LMS was higher. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ prabbit's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11142 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96124 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
