Craig,
Thanks for the quick response. I understand and agree that JSR-286 is a
higher priority for Pluto at the moment than a 1.2.0 release. We're not
looking at 286 yet, but it is definitely something that we will want to
leverage in the future ... so thanks for all your work to get the RI in
line with the spec! I wish I could help out some with that effort too.
We'll figure out something for a Geronimo 2.1 release so that we can
preserve the snapshot when we release. Thanks for giving us a great
Portal Server to utilize for our admin console!
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe,
I wish that I could help you, but I appear to be the only active
committer right now, and have to do this work on my own time in addition
to my other 'free time' committments (such as family).
Right now, my focus is getting the JSR-286 RI work merged into the trunk
to move Pluto toward a 2.0 release since JSR-286 is just about finished.
I really could use some help with that too. Pluto is charged as the
reference implementation of the Java Portlet API, so I think that the
new RI should be our top priority now, IMHO.
If Pluto 1.2.0 is an itch that another committer wants to scratch, they
are free to do so, but I'd hope that they would help with the JSR-286
work also (especially those on the EG).
Sorry for the rant. As you can guess, I'm a bit frustrated. I'm spending
way to much time on this project than I should lately (ask my wife).
Excuse me, but I have to get back to the job I have that pays the bills.
/Craig
-----Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -----
To: pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
From: Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11/26/2007 12:11PM
Subject: 1.2.0 Release?
How close is Pluto to a 1.2.0 release?
We're currently using Pluto 1.2.0-SNAPSHOP in Geronimo trunk (as
mentioned in another post by Paul McMahan) and we are preparing for an
upcoming Geronimo 2.1 release.
Thanks,
Joe Bohn
