Gurusamy Sarathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2000 10:00:09 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
>> Sorry if some of these codes are not recognised. Taking E<copy> as an
>> example, it is valid Pod (perlpod says that HTML escapes are supported,
>> Pod::Checker says its okay and Pod::Html output will display it fine)
>> so shouldn't we be at least allowing for Pod::Text to make a stab at
>> the right answer?
> Your patch looks fine to me. If people with exotic xterms need them
> supported, they'll be kind enough to send in patches, I presume.
Looks fine to me too. It'll be in the next podlators. (Sorry, was
meaning to get back to you earlier when you sent it to me directly. I'm
just dropping stuff left and right lately.)
It may be clearer if you read "ISO 8859-1" for "valid in an xterm."
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
