On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 12:10:55PM -0800, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2000 10:00:09 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
> >Sorry if some of these codes are not recognised. Taking E<copy> as an
> >example, it is valid Pod (perlpod says that HTML escapes are
> >supported, Pod::Checker says its okay and Pod::Html output will
> >display it fine) so shouldn't we be at least allowing for Pod::Text to
> >make a stab at the right answer?
>
> Your patch looks fine to me. If people with exotic xterms need them
> supported, they'll be kind enough to send in patches, I presume.
Is not it ironic that *after* Unicode finally became (almost)
supported, we started to put encoding-specific stuff in? Or is it
riding over unicode coinciding with Latin-1 over the first "page"?
So that it will work with any encoding given a proper output channel?
Ilya
