Sean M. Burke wrote: > At 13:32 2002-04-03 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > >> U< title | uri > > > > I would greatly appreciate if L were the absolutely only Pod formatting > code that uses that execrable "|". It complicates an already very > complicated parsing model.
It's easier to use '|' since it's very similar to L<>, But any other separator is fine with me, will '=' be OK, or '#'? Any better ideas? I still prefer '|'... >> If the idea is accepted it would be great to get it in, before 5.8.0 >> is released. I know that this won't help older perls, but it's better >> than nothing. > > > Perlpodspec isn't even implemented yet, in time for 5.8.0 (for which I > take blame). Wanting extensions to it to be implemented is dazzling > optimism. Not completely implemented, yes. but the earlier things get into the perlpodspec the earlier they will be implemented. Even if not supported by all tools yet, I prefer to use a to-be-used markup syntax in first place. For example once U<> goes in I'll add a support for it in Pod::POM and can patch Pod::Html to handle U<> in 5.8.0. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
