Sean M. Burke wrote: > Revisiting what Stas wrote the other day: > At 13:32 2002-04-03 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > >> I know this has been discussed before, and the conclusion was that L<> >> won't handle URIs. > > > To the contrary: L<scheme:...> /is/ explicitly part of perlpodspec and > of perlpod, which says: > � > Or you can link to a web page: > * L<scheme:...> > Links to an absolute URL. For example, L<http://www.perl.org/>. But note > that there is no corresponding L<text|scheme:...> syntax, for various > reasons. > �
I know. The last bit is exactly what needs to be fixed. Consider: http://perl.apache.org/preview/modperl-docs/dst_html/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html#Sometimes_it_Works__Sometimes_it_Doesn_t That's not something you want to see as a title of <a href></a> Otherwise everybody who tries to use POD for a little bit more than perl*.pod pages, is doomed to ugliness in resulting documents and need to look for workarounds. U<> will solve this problem. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
