Shawn H Corey <shawnhco...@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it should be an option. Sometimes it is necessary to know that a
> change in appearance is caused by changes to a module and not to the
> generating document.
Do we need to explicitly state that it's an option, or would removing the
requirement to always do it still be okay? The way I was thinking of it
is that what formatters put into comments is generally up to them; by
default, they *can* include anything they want. Removing the requirement
thus just leaves the decision unconstrained.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -- Russ Allbery, Just Another Perl Hacker
$^=q;@!>~|{>krw>yn{u<$$<[~||<Juukn{=,<S~|}<Jwx}qn{<Yn{u<Qjltn{ > 0gFzD gD,
00Fz, 0,,( 0hF 0g)F/=, 0> "L$/GEIFewe{,$/ 0C$~> "@=,m,|,(e 0.), 01,pnn,y{
rw} >;,$0=q,$,,($_=$^)=~y,$/ C-~><@=\n\r,-~$:-u/ #y,d,s,(\$.),$1,gee,print
