On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:55 PM Shawn H Corey <shawnhco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2024-03-15 14:38, Russ Allbery wrote: > > If you would be happy with a PR to remove that bullet point, we're just > vigorously agreeing. 🙂 Otherwise, I'm not sure what you're asking for > instead. > > > I guess I wasn't clear. I was talking about making the requirement an option > for the formatters. When the user runs a formatter, they can specify an > option to include the info in their output. In other words, move it from a > requirement to an optional implementation for a formatter.
Formatters can implement whatever options they want, and can output however they want. What is the purpose of stating this specific option as something they can do? It can't be standardized, because it will inherently be dependent on the output format.
