On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:59 +0100, zyx wrote:
> I'm afraid I still miss here some important detail(s), I'm sorry.
Hi,
just as a follow up, after some playing with it and with help from some
other folks, it's just as you said, Leonard. Unfortunately trying to
parse and interpret the existing appearance streams and update them (or
just create a new) with the correct value of the fields before signing,
is quite out of question for me. I'm sorry.
I changed podofosign to at least set AcroForm's /NeedAppearances to
'false', if it's 'true', but nothing else. I left there a TODO for
anyone brave, though it won't be me for sure. For the record, it's
revision 1799.
As far as I can tell, this behaviour is similar to what some other
libraries, which can sign PDF documents, do.
Bye,
zyx
--
http://www.litePDF.cz i...@litepdf.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
