"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 02:48, Rainer Klute wrote:
>> "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >So far all of the POI subprojects have a helpful "How-TO" and code
>> >samples demonstrating their use. The POI user community seems to
>> >greatly appreciate this.
>>
>> I'll look at it as time permits.
>>
>
>I'm not just bitchy, I'm the one who gets all the emails if it isn't
>there. If you aren't capable then I'll do it. Just, If I have to
>figure it out and do it then it won't necessarily be accurate.
Calm down, I'll do it. It's just a matter of time. And I am not talking about months
or years.
>Furthermore if you look at the new web page, you'll notice all the other
>APIs have it. If this one is the only one that doesn't it:
>
>1. Makes the web page look stupid.
>2. Speaks volumes about quality.
>
>If you feel you've adequately described all aspects in the javadoc,
>simply copying those passages and formatting them into a conceptual
>overview should take all of 5 minutes right?
Yeah, and if you change something in the javadocs you have to do the same in the other
documentation. Redundancy is the root of all evil (well, in this context). I prefer to
keep one sets of documents here and the other sets of documents there. I have no
problem with moving over the stuff from the HPSF package description to the HOW-TO/Use
Case area. But I don't want to maintain the same information at two different places.
Best regards
Rainer Klute
RAINER KLUTE IT-CONSULTING
Dipl.-Inform.
Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K�rner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824
D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423
