-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:23:34 -0500 (EST) > Von: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: policyd-weight feature request
> Hi, > > Was wondering if support for whitelists would be made available in > policyd-weight? > > For example, see: http://www.dnswl.org/ > > I add it in here: > > 'list.dnswl.org', 0.00, -5.0, 'DNSWL', > > But it still counts as a 'bad' RBL, > I had that issue some time ago. I wrote to Robert asking to only count as bad dnsbl if the rating added is positive. If a negative rating is added, then the bad dnsbl is not counted. I think that this is now the default way of calculating inside policyd-weight. What version are you using? > is there any chance of making a > whitelist section where if X number of whitelist RBLs include a certain IP > -or- the value is less than X it is allowed? > > This then leads to a second question, perhaps one wants to place emphasis > or weight upon the trust level: > > Per: http://www.dnswl.org/tech > > Trustworthiness / Score (127.0.x.Y): > > * 0 = none - only avoid outright blocking (eg Hotmail, Yahoo > mailservers, -0.1) > * 1 = low - reduce chance of false positives (-1.0) > * 2 = medium - make sure to avoid false positives but allow override > for clear cases (-10.0) > * 3 = high - avoid override (-100.0). > > So it would need to be something like: > > list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.0 -5.0 > list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.1 -3.0 > > > Just an idea.. But the main request is a @whitelist for > RBL's to help reduce false positives. > > Justin. > Steve > ____________________________________________________________ > Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/ -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10 ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
