On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Steve wrote:
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:23:34 -0500 (EST)
Von: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: policyd-weight feature request
Hi,
Was wondering if support for whitelists would be made available in
policyd-weight?
For example, see: http://www.dnswl.org/
I add it in here:
'list.dnswl.org', 0.00, -5.0, 'DNSWL',
But it still counts as a 'bad' RBL,
I had that issue some time ago. I wrote to Robert asking to only count as bad
dnsbl if the rating added is positive. If a negative rating is added, then the
bad dnsbl is not counted. I think that this is now the default way of
calculating inside policyd-weight. What version are you using?
0.1.14 beta-12 currently.
is there any chance of making a
whitelist section where if X number of whitelist RBLs include a certain IP
-or- the value is less than X it is allowed?
This then leads to a second question, perhaps one wants to place emphasis
or weight upon the trust level:
Per: http://www.dnswl.org/tech
Trustworthiness / Score (127.0.x.Y):
* 0 = none - only avoid outright blocking (eg Hotmail, Yahoo
mailservers, -0.1)
* 1 = low - reduce chance of false positives (-1.0)
* 2 = medium - make sure to avoid false positives but allow override
for clear cases (-10.0)
* 3 = high - avoid override (-100.0).
So it would need to be something like:
list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.0 -5.0
list.dnswl.org ret=127.0.0.1 -3.0
Just an idea.. But the main request is a @whitelist for
RBL's to help reduce false positives.
Justin.
Steve
____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10
____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
