* Henrik Krohns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-23 14:08:41 +0200]:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:55:04AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> > Yes but the reason I'd like it in policyd-weight instead of postfix is its
> > not a good idea to explicitly allow/whitelist that many hosts, some of them
> > are still spam, I got a spam yesterday from a host that was listed on that
> > list, that is why I'd rather take the weight of all of the RBL's combined +
> > the whitelist and hash it out.
>
> You are not whitelisting anything in a sense. Only preventing policyd-weight
> from making unnecessary and potentially unsafe checks. If a message is
> coming from a whitelisted host, you should be just doing a complete scan
> with SpamAssassin.
+1!
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
