For the record: it's still the case that I've never met with or communicated 
with Chip Berlet, nor have I barely thought of him since the last time this 
subject came up.  I just did a quick search on Berlet and discovered that he 
now has a blog here:

     http://chipberlet.blogspot.com/

Frankly, to indulge in a bit of braggadocio, I think political-research and my 
Google Reader Shared Items page cover a much wider range of interesting topics 
than Berlet's blog.  He seems to be mostly focused on Dominionism these days, 
and not much else.  I must admit that I do agree with his views on that 
subject, as no doubt do most of the readers of this list.  I favor the term 
"Christian Armageddonists" to describe the phenomenon.

RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                               Chip, you 
really are quite the "gag"-puller. 


Peace, 
Kris Millegan
On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Sean McBride wrote:

I'm not sure this post contributes to inter-ethnic amity, but Eastman has 
rather invited it.  Generally, if you kick other ethnic or religious groups 
hard in sensitive areas, they will kick back.  It's all purely Pavlovian.

By the way, I've never allowed Dick Eastman to post here because of this 
problem he has.  I think he's a sincere truth seeker with some original 
insights about deep politics, but injecting any form of bigotry into these 
discussions makes it impossible to proceed rationally.  He needs to rework his 
world model from the ground up.

tigerbengalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:He's still an asshat, no doubt still an 
anti-Semitic moron, and probably has a closet full of porn.

Sean McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My comment:

Dick Eastman deserves some credit for acknowledging and apologizing for the 
antisemitism which disfigures quite a few of his posts.  (And Mark Bilk and I 
deserve some credit for confronting him about this antisemitism.)  No one is 
beyond redemption -- perhaps Eastman will begin to think more clearly about 
these issues in the future.

A basic rule of thumb: judge people as individuals, not as members of ethnic, 
religious or national groups.  Don't attack entire groups of people on the 
basis of ethnic, religious or national stereotypes.  It's the American Way.

All forms of obsessive ethnic and religious bigotry are much like alcoholism -- 
the victims of this disease need help.  Deep inside all bigots know that they 
have a psychological problem and that this is no way to live.

Dick Eastman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Dick Eastman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: When I attacked Jewish culture in my last post -- I crossed over into 
Hitlerland.
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:55:48 -0700



I have let myself become unjustly critical of Jews as a group -- greatly 
harming the effort of bringing to justice individual (Jewish) perpetrators of 
specific monstrous crimes and social problems 

 
Mark Bilk warned me this would happen. 
 
As some find it hard not to blame the "white man" in general  -- so this white 
man has gone and slandered innocent Jews (by bunching them with the guilty 
ones.)
 
Guilt belongs only to individuals.  Collective guilt is unjust.  And to attack 
a people and their entire culture is to engage in collective guilt.
 
I probably won't quit posting  -- never seem to be able to do that for long.  
But you and I know that I have a problem.
 
It doesn't matter how right I am on some things  -- better to let the guilty go 
free than to condemn the innocent.
 
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
 
 
p.s.  in case you are confused  --  I am referring to my post:
 
Re: Weaponized Porn -- letters and responses -- oi vey!








---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.





= 
     
                               

Reply via email to