Gaar, thanks. I'll keep that in mind.
On Oct 8, 2:54 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope. > > You, or anyone for that matter, are free to look at it all you like... > > I am just saying that we should hold BOTH sides to the same scrutiny. > > We can all SEE what happened with the Keating 5, we don't have to be > told that it is a bad thing for McCain, the man admits it for himself. > > Now, how has Obama reacted when questioned about his questionable > associations? > > Does he admit bad Judgement in ANY of them? > > So please, let's discuss these things in a Fair and Balanced manner, > and see who accounts for their actions and who does not. > > On Oct 8, 12:48 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > Let me make sure I understand you. Your saying that if a man, any man > > I must assume, is found non-guilty of a charge by the appropiate court > > be it criminal or civil then that is the end of it and it's improper > > to use the charge itself against him to slander him or judge his > > character? Is that what your saying? Just trying to get clarity on > > your position. > > > On Oct 8, 7:37 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 8, 12:17 am, "[ a patriotic Republican ]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > sorry lew but that isn't true mccain was not found inocent ! > > > > Yes he was. > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
