just as William Ayers is innocent of being a terrorist ! thank you for admitting the truth of the matter . On Oct 9, 4:21 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In THIS Country, oh so ignorant one, we are considered INNOCENT until > PROVEN Guilty. > > Regardless of your ignorance on the matter. > > And since you, or no one else has proven him Guilty, that makes him > innocent by default. > > On Oct 9, 1:10 am, "[ a patriotic Republican ]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ The Senate Ethics Committee did not pursue, for lack of > > jurisdiction, > > any possible ethics breaches in McCain's delayed reimbursements to > > Keating for trips at the latter's expense, because they occurred > > while > > McCain was in the House.[49] The House Committee on Standards of > > Official Conduct said that it too lacked jurisdiction, because McCain > > was no longer in the House.[53] It said it did not require that > > McCain > > amend his existing financial disclosure forms for his House years, on > > the grounds that McCain had now fully reimbursed Keating's company. > > [53] ] > > > nice try sunshine oh so close but you still missed it . McCain was not > > found innocent ! as stated above they chose not to prosecute not that > > he was innocent . > > > On Oct 9, 4:03 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For those who c`an't read I post this AGAIN in this Thread... > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five > > > > Glenn and McCain: cleared of impropriety but criticized for poor > > > judgment > > > The Senate Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of Glenn in > > > the > > > scheme was minimal, and the charges against him were dropped.[47] He > > > was only criticized by the Committee for "poor judgment."[50] > > > > The Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of McCain in the > > > scheme was also minimal, and he too was cleared of all charges > > > against > > > him.[48][47] McCain was criticized by the Committee for exercising > > > "poor judgment" when he met with the federal regulators on Keating's > > > behalf.[7] The report also said that McCain's "actions were not > > > improper nor attended with gross negligence and did not reach the > > > level of requiring institutional action against him....Senator McCain > > > has violated no law of the United States or specific Rule of the > > > United States Senate."[51] On his Keating Five experience, McCain has > > > said: "The appearance of it was wrong. It's a wrong appearance when a > > > group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, > > > because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. > > > And > > > it was the wrong thing to do."[7] > > > > Regardless of the level of their involvement, both senators were > > > greatly affected by it. McCain would write in 2002 that attending the > > > two April 1987 meetings was "the worst mistake of my life".[52] Glenn > > > has described the Senate Ethics Committee investigation as the low > > > point of his life.[8] > > > > The Senate Ethics Committee did not pursue, for lack of jurisdiction, > > > any possible ethics breaches in McCain's delayed reimbursements to > > > Keating for trips at the latter's expense, because they occurred > > > while > > > McCain was in the House.[49] The House Committee on Standards of > > > Official Conduct said that it too lacked jurisdiction, because McCain > > > was no longer in the House.[53] It said it did not require that > > > McCain > > > amend his existing financial disclosure forms for his House years, on > > > the grounds that McCain had now fully reimbursed Keating's company. > > > [53] > > > > On Oct 9, 12:33 am, "[ a patriotic Republican ]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > post any proof you have that mcCain was not involved in the this > > > > crime . > > > > > On Oct 8, 8:37 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 8, 12:17 am, "[ a patriotic Republican ]" > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > sorry lew but that isn't true mccain was not found inocent ! > > > > > > Yes he was. > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
