Gaar, What socialist? There's no socialist running for POTUS.
On Oct 30, 1:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does it not surprise me that you would prefer a Socialist to an > American War Hero? > > Oh that's right... > > You're not American, and you aren't supposed to have a Vote. > > Thanks for letting us know this is just your opinion, as a non- > Citizen. > > On Oct 30, 10:31 am, Weebop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have written and re-written about three replies to your last post > > and the more I wrote the more I realised that most of what you said > > makes sense and most of what I was writing was based on my annoyance > > of your choice of title for your original post more then the facts in > > hand. And so I concede defeat on many of the points you raise but not > > all as I still feel that you are arguing from one view point and not > > the entire picture when it comes to the view Iraqi's have of the > > coallition force. While many view Iran as a biggist threat I also > > believe many view the coalition as the biggest threat. And until there > > are no foriegn troops on their streets (and yes that includes Iranian > > troops) I don't think we will be able to fully asses the success or > > failiure of the invasion. I do agree that making Iran stronger in the > > region is not a good thing but don't believe that is Obama's plan, a > > man who refuses to discount the possibility of using military force > > against Iran is hardly backing away and handing them control. He said > > himself that the "regime is a threat to all of us" which shows he > > takes the situation seriously. > > > Just to clarify a couple of things before I finish, I am not a US > > citizen but I have an interest in US politics as I believe it affects > > the entire world. My belief is that the US foriegn policy has been far > > too aggressive for a number of years now and there has been a > > willingness to use military force, or the threat of military force > > earlier in situations where in the past diplomacy would still have > > been the preffered option, the obvious example being the invasion of > > Iraq. With this in mind I think a change is needed and I think Obama > > is more suited to bring that change then McCain. I don't agree with > > everything either of the candidates say but as with all politics in a > > democracy I believe you have to choose the "lesser of two evils" and > > in my opinion Obama is the preffered candidate. > > > These are my views and I don't expect you to agree with them but as I > > don't post on here much these days I thought I'd share them- Hide quoted > > text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
