John,
A number of times in fact. But even if I took the time to find and post
a few of them, you would ignore them and post some snarky comment that
has nothing to do with what was posted. How do I know this? Simple! You
never address anything specific.
On 05/17/2011 04:49 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
J. Ashley: Has anyone posted any comments in support of your caveman
anarchy? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. —
On May 16, 5:42 pm, Jonathan<[email protected]> wrote:
I find it extremely interesting that the only comments on John's New
Constitution come from those who are able to poke holes in it. I have
yet to see anyone post any comments in support of his diatribe.
On 05/16/2011 01:41 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Do this MJ: Spend nearly 15 years of your life pinning and polishing
a New Constitution. On the day of the referendum, the voters will get
to decide whose has the most appeal to them. Your ideas of the worth
of my document don't matter. � J. A. A. �
On May 16, 2:11 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote:
Again you attempt to change the subject.
Whether I read or have read Atlas Shrugged is irrelevant ... just like the
remainder of your response.
Regard$,
--MJ "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or religious or to
preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. Government should be repressive
no further than is necessary to secure liberty by protecting the equal rights of each
from aggression...[when] governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in
danger of defeating the very ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 07:44
PM 5/12/2011, you wrote:MJ: You should read 'Atlas Shrugged.' Government could NEVER
orchestrate an entire economy, the way "the law of supply and demand"
can. Our biggest problem with government is that those out-of-touch,
career politicians have zero real-world experience. They actually
BELIEVE that they are necessary to determine how everything on Earth
gets done. Within four total years of the ratification my New
Constitution there won't be a single "career path" politician in
Washington! � J. A. A. �
On May 12, 1:47 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote:
At 08:18 PM 5/11/2011, you wrote:Dear Jonathan: No! Only "schemes" that have
the strings being pulled
by government would be socialist. My New Constitution includes these
and other protections to require "fairness" (not... equality) from
businesses:
Government REQUIRING any business, individual, collection of individuals that
serves ANYTHING other than securing EVERYONE's right to life; their own life;
self-ownership serves to provide advantage to some at the expense of others AND
necessarily interferes with the use of one's private property -- you know,
socialism.
You STILL do not see how you are endorsing and promoting what you claim to be
eliminating."Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and to
their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business
practices require that management be forthright with employees and
customers without coercion."
This is socialism in any of its many forms.
Take 'discriminatory' -- which necessarily occurs whenever more than one person
seeks an available position ...
What about the discrimination against the Business Owner that occurs when people
choose NOT to work for him?And... "Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures
that are in the
best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper."
MORE Socialism in any of its many forms.
Regard$,
--MJ"Daily experience proves clearly to everybody but the most bigoted fanatics of socialism
that governmental management is inefficient and wasteful" -- Ludwig von Mises in
"Economic Freedom and Interventionism," 1990.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Freedom is always illegal!
When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
have any possibility of being free.
"Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological
refuge of unthinking patriotism?"
Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University
--
Freedom is always illegal!
When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
have any possibility of being free.
"Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological
refuge of unthinking patriotism?"
Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
